EDGAR Definition

According to the ethnographic definition proposed¹ by the US government,  Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) was created by application of the Section 4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 voted by the Congress after the stock market crash of 1929. The SEC is primarily established with the aim of enforcing the new financial laws, promoting the stability of the markets and especially protecting investors from corporate abuses related to the buying and selling of shares such as as insider trading. Franklin D. Roosevelt appoints Joseph P. Kennedy, father of John F. Kennedy, first president of the SEC in 1934.
Its Corporation Finance division is responsible for the EDGAR system (Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system) which has made available to the public since 1984 all the periodic reports of the companies which it is also obligatorily responsible for analyzing. Structure is also invested with the interpretation of the regulations.

EDGAR criticism 

Efficient on the financial markets, EDGAR operates as a blinding reflection which hides the elements necessary for the understanding of iter criminis anchored from the real market. For the investor, it is mystifying, lacunar and does not give any insight into the foreign delinquency forces at work which the effects can be felt on the US markets. Investor observes to see nothing. More details.

ELISA add-on

The reality of the facts established by any partially disclosed descriptive study can be called into question thenceforth « tortious acts » can never have meaning as such and for themselves. The phenomena that occur in reality can only make sense in a global context. But the EDGAR public registry is precisely not what qualifies "complex offences", but what builds, organizes and shapes financial market surveillance. This framework can escapes to public prosecutor’s survey and must be developed in conjunction with real market. The New York Providers add-on published by ELISA is complete the missing data in EDGAR so that the user can better understand the meaning of the facts he observes, their organization, their logic.

EDGAR + ELISA
Incriminating and exonerating evidence

Developing a new critical analysis of investment after the 2020 crisis has required a change in our view of the anti-fraud scene. More precisely to look differently on it, on what is happening, on what matters. We are talking here first of all about a vision of financial exchanges informed from bottom across intrication. We will consult, use, preserve and/or disclose to the competent authorities any material matter against you whether there is reasonable cause, a valid and legally enforceable warrant, a summons, a court order, a statute or regulation or any other decision. However, if we find that a specific request for disclosure of a user’s material elements is legally questionable or constitutes an abuse on the part of the judicial system and that the user concerned does not intend to oppose such disclosure himself, we will make every effort to stop it. We undertake to notify you by email within ten (10) calendar days, to the extent possible, before disclosing your personal information following a judicial hearing. However, it is important to note that such a notification will only be sent to you if the law does not object to it, if there is no real threat to the life or physical integrity of a person caused or exacerbated by such a notification and if you have provided us with an email address.

EDGAR in NYP
Specialia generalibus derogant

January 2012, ELISA dedicated a transversal application program to promote the eligibility of small and medium enterprises from its franchise to State tenders. An inspection committee independently examines the extent and reality of the professional skills of domestic and foreign companies. Since 2019, this program has become The New York Providers, a contributory fact-checking with full related links to the EDGAR data¹. In the section Spinneret, these material elements allow any person, investors and institutions to better map the private sector by intrication and thus, know the right criminal expression. As in criminal matters, the manifestation of the truth is acquired by any admissible evidence ( see Incriminating and exonerating evidence ), Auditorat derogate from general law such as Data/Privacy protection law. Any undue constraint on Elisa’s contributors, administrators, sponsor, website's hosts and the abusive breach of secrecy, are aggravations. Will be prosecuted as the perpetrator of the main crime, the accomplice of these offenses.

Enforcement and Complaint

EDGAR is enforced by the law for US activities companies as defined by legislator since 1984. We have no power to modify or delete information held by the US SEC. You should address your complaints to the appropriate government authorities.

Privacy Policy

However, we know that you value security and confidentiality, and we do as well. That’s why Elisa makes protecting your data and making it accessible when you need it a priority. Learn more about how we protect your personal data and how we give you control over it.